212 search results for
Public education and reconciliation
Recommendation 2:
Support a central focus on Indigenous peoples choosing how they will organize and govern themselves consistent with the right to self-determination.
Indigenous self-determination is foundational to the UN Declaration.
Historically, self-government agreements have been paternalistic and subject to discriminatory colonial policies.
Advancing Indigenous self-government will require the BC government to invest in the work being implemented by Nations.
The right to self-determination necessarily includes the recognition and revitalization of Indigenous laws and legal systems.
The BC government should support this work apart from achieving agreements on other outcomes (i.e., resources), and without demanding a prescribed Crown role in the rebuilding effort.
Indigenous self-determination is foundational to the UN Declaration.
Historically, self-government agreements have been paternalistic and subject to discriminatory colonial policies.
Advancing Indigenous self-government will require the BC government to invest in the work being implemented by Nations.
The right to self-determination necessarily includes the recognition and revitalization of Indigenous laws and legal systems.
The BC government should support this work apart from achieving agreements on other outcomes (i.e., resources), and without demanding a prescribed Crown role in the rebuilding effort.
-
Category and theme:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 1:
Start by acknowledging that the cultural heritage of Indigenous peoples belongs to Indigenous peoples. Without exaggeration, 99.9% of archaeological sites in B.C., extending back in time more than 10,000 years, are those of Indigenous peoples. Yet Indigenous peoples have had little say in or control over decisions made concerning their study, preservation or destruction.
-
Category and theme:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 8:
Set out measures for special identification, recognition, and protection of intangible heritage. It is recommended that B.C. support the 2003 UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage (the Convention) by articulating in legislation and regulations the means by which intangible Indigenous cultural heritage is identified, recognized, and protected.
-
Category and theme:
Audience:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 2:
Recognize that the Indigenous understandings of Indigenous cultural heritage are both tangible and intangible and are holistic, integrated, fulsome, and inclusive. This will require moving away from the narrow focus on ‘archaeological’ material culture currently common to the interpretation of the heritage legislation such as the Heritage Conservation Act and the delineation of a set date of 1846 as archaeological in nature.
-
Category and theme:
Audience:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 13:
Recognize and protect Indigenous cultural heritage places of significance and places that are endangered yearly through the application of legislative tools for heritage recognition and protection and through provision of funding for projects and initiatives designed to safeguarding such places. This must include a public registry of Indigenous cultural heritage places that allows Indigenous communities to control which places may be publicly known.
-
Category and theme:
Audience:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 18:
Provide support for a committee, such as the FPCC Indigenous Cultural Heritage Advisory Committee, of qualified Indigenous experts to advise B.C. on a case-by-case basis on shared Indigenous and non-Indigenous cultural heritage interests.
-
Category and theme:
Audience:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 21:
Provide specific funding for Indigenous-led initiatives to commemorate and interpret Indigenous cultural heritage. Such funding should be broadly distributed according to each Indigenous Nation’s current capacity and needs. For example, there is a need for Indigenous communities to work internally in the form of committees or working groups to decide how they want to commemorate sites of trauma, such as residential schools, and how the process of commemoration should unfold.
-
Category and theme:
Audience:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 7:
In addressing Recommendation 6, recognize five key points from “Why Intangible Heritage Matters” (Nicholas 2014):
- Heritage protection and management remain focused on the tangible;
- However, no object or place has meaning without the intangible values ascribed;
- For Indigenous peoples, the tangible and intangible are often indivisible, which has substantial implications for heritage protection;
- A double standard exists regarding how Indigenous intangible heritage, including Traditional Knowledge, and Western Science are valued or treated.
- Efforts to decolonize heritage research and to implement such developments as the UNDRIP will continue to fail if intangible heritage is ignored.
-
Category and theme:
Audience:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 20:
Hire Indigenous People experienced in Indigenous cultural heritage to foster new ways of thinking within government and to develop common understandings between government and Indigenous communities.
-
Category and theme:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 9:
Harmonize statutory and operational relations between provincial agencies such as the Archaeology Branch and Heritage Branch of the Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development. This requires better communication and strengthened relations between provincial agencies dealing with Indigenous cultural heritage, including the Ministry of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation as a key facilitator of relations.
-
Category and theme:
Audience:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation: