72 search results for
International human rights
Recommendation 43:
We call upon federal, provincial, territorial, and municipal governments to fully adopt and implement the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as the framework for reconciliation.
-
Category and theme:
Audience:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 86:
We call upon Canadian journalism programs and media schools to require education for all students on the history of Aboriginal peoples, including the history and legacy of residential schools, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Treaties and Aboriginal rights, Indigenous law, and Aboriginal–Crown relations.
-
Category and theme:
Audience:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 49:
We call upon all religious denominations and faith groups who have not already done so to repudiate concepts used to justify European sovereignty over Indigenous lands and peoples, such as the Doctrine of Discovery and terra nullius.
-
Category and theme:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 2:
We call upon all governments, with the full participation of Indigenous women, girls, and 2SLGBTQQIA people, to immediately implement and fully comply with all relevant rights instruments, including but not limited to:
- ICCPR, ICESCR, UNCRC, CEDAW, and ICERD, as well as all optional protocols to these instruments, including the 3rd Protocol to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC);
- American Convention on Human Rights: specifically, that Canada ratify the American Convention on Human Rights and the Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment, and Eradication of Violence against Women;
- All the recommendations of the 2015 UN CEDAW Inquiry Report and cooperation with the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on all follow-up procedures;
- All recommendations made by international human rights bodies, including treaty-monitoring bodies, on causes and recommendations to address violence against all, but specifically Indigenous women, girls, and 2SLGBTQQIA individuals; and
- UNDRIP, including recognition, protection, and support of Indigenous self-governance and self-determination, as defined by UNDRIP and by Indigenous Peoples, including that these rights are guaranteed equally to women and men, as rights protected under section 35 of the Constitution. This requires respecting and making space for Indigenous self-determination and self-governance, and the free, prior, and informed consent of Indigenous Peoples to all decision-making processes that affect them, eliminating gender discrimination in the Indian Act, and amending the Constitution to bring it into conformity with UNDRIP.
-
Category and theme:
- Access to justice ,
- Decolonization and Indigenous rights ,
- Discrimination and hate ,
- Gender-based violence ,
- Human rights system ,
- Indigenous children and youth in care ,
- Indigenous rights and self-governance ,
- International human rights ,
- Missing and murdered Indigenous women, girls, Two-Spirit, and LGBTQ2SIA+ people
Audience:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 1:
Despite the Canadian federal government ratifying the UN CRC, provinces are inconsistent in how and when legal counsel is appointed for children (CBA, 2020; Child Projection Project Committee, BCLI, 2020; Lovinsky, 2016). Even within a province, there are often inconsistencies across different areas of law (Child Protection Project Committee, BCLI, 2020; Lovinsky, 2016). The literature also notes that current independent provincial and territorial Child Advocate and Representative Offices vary widely across provinces and are vulnerable to funding and operational changes due to provincial restructuring and changes in political priorities (Bendo & Mitchell, 2017; CBA, 2020). For instance, Ontario’s Provincial Advocate for Children and Youth was recently closed, and its investigative functions were transferred to the Ontario Ombudsman, which does not carry the same specialized approach towards children’s rights as the Provincial Advocate for Children and Youth (CBA, 2020).
These issues can be addressed through a national plan across provinces to coordinate efforts and maintain consistency (Byrne & Lundy, 2019; CBA, 2020; Collins, 2019). The CBA recommends that the federal government develop an independent National Commissioner for Children and Youth reporting to both Houses of Parliament, with a statutory mandate to protect and promote human rights amongst children and youth in Canada, including their rights to participation, and to liaise with provincial, territorial and Indigenous counterparts to coordinate efforts of mutual concern and overlapping jurisdiction. The CBA further suggests that the National Commissioner should serve to coordinate and ensure consistency amongst independent child advocate offices across provinces and territories. Finally, the CBA emphasizes the importance of incorporating and protecting the rights and interests of Indigenous children and youth when developing a national policy on children’s rights.
These issues can be addressed through a national plan across provinces to coordinate efforts and maintain consistency (Byrne & Lundy, 2019; CBA, 2020; Collins, 2019). The CBA recommends that the federal government develop an independent National Commissioner for Children and Youth reporting to both Houses of Parliament, with a statutory mandate to protect and promote human rights amongst children and youth in Canada, including their rights to participation, and to liaise with provincial, territorial and Indigenous counterparts to coordinate efforts of mutual concern and overlapping jurisdiction. The CBA further suggests that the National Commissioner should serve to coordinate and ensure consistency amongst independent child advocate offices across provinces and territories. Finally, the CBA emphasizes the importance of incorporating and protecting the rights and interests of Indigenous children and youth when developing a national policy on children’s rights.
-
Category and theme:
Audience:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 15:
The Supreme Court of Canada, in Michel v. Graydon, which specifically deals with the B.C. Family Law Act, discusses principles that apply to the interpretation of statutes which directly bear on the role of the B.C. Legislature in upholding children’s rights, including their participation rights. The concurring judgment states: (1) that the Legislature is presumed to take into account Canada’s international obligations, which includes those found in the CRC (at para. 103); and (2) that the Legislature is taken to know the social and historical context in which it makes its intention known (at para. 97). The literature, taking an approach consistent with these principles, suggests that the Legislature plays a critical role in implementing children’s right to participate effectively in court processes. Though many important legislative, regulatory and policy steps have been taken, the literature identifies several others that are necessary to meet B.C.’s obligations to children in family law and child welfare processes. They include the specific incorporation of the CRC in both the FLA and the CFCSA, ensuring that both court processes incorporate procedural safeguards and guarantees, making sure that children in court processes are fully informed of their participatory rights and allowing children to apply for declarations relating to their best interests.
In addition, specific legislative changes and clarifications are necessary in the FLA and the CFCSA. For the FLA, these include a review of the following sections: s. 37(1) (b), views of the child; the s. 1 definition of family violence (to clarify that intent is not required); s. 203, dealing with legal representation; s. 199, dealing with conflict and family violence; and s. 37(2)(j), considering any other civil or criminal proceeding. For the CFCSA, amendments are required which provide the legal advice and representation children require throughout the processes, as well as specific provisions relating to hearing children’s views.
In addition, specific legislative changes and clarifications are necessary in the FLA and the CFCSA. For the FLA, these include a review of the following sections: s. 37(1) (b), views of the child; the s. 1 definition of family violence (to clarify that intent is not required); s. 203, dealing with legal representation; s. 199, dealing with conflict and family violence; and s. 37(2)(j), considering any other civil or criminal proceeding. For the CFCSA, amendments are required which provide the legal advice and representation children require throughout the processes, as well as specific provisions relating to hearing children’s views.
-
Category and theme:
Audience:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 1:
The specific vulnerabilities of children of incarcerated parents must be considered and taken into account. These children have rights and those rights must be protected. Children should not be discriminated against because of the actions of a member of their family or for any other reason. The best interests of the child must be considered explicitly in all decisions that affect these children (Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 3). These children must be provided with the opportunity for their views to be heard, directly or indirectly, in relation to decisions which may affect them (Article 12).
Enhancing the Protective Environment for Children of Parents in Conflict with the Law or Incarcerated: A Framework for Action
Group/author:
Elizabeth Fry Society of Greater Vancouver, International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy, University of the Fraser Valley – School of Criminology and Criminal Justice
Elizabeth Fry Society of Greater Vancouver, International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy, University of the Fraser Valley – School of Criminology and Criminal Justice
Year:
2018
2018
-
Category and theme:
Audience:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 11:
The majority of Canadian provinces have separate government bodies in place that provide legal counsel to children (Lovinsky, 2016). B.C. must also assume the responsibility for providing funding and personnel to secure legal representation for children in all guardianship and family law cases in order to adhere to the UNCRC’s recommendations and FLA’s best interest provisions, and to concur with the 2020 CBA report recommendations.
-
Category and theme:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 16:
The literature has long supported specific incorporation of the CRC in all legislation relevant to children. It is particularly important in family law and child welfare cases but has not happened in B.C. (Brown, Findlay, Martinson, & Williams, 2021; CBA 2020; Andreychuk & Fraser, 2007; UN Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding Observations: Canada, 2012). An example of the effective incorporation is found in Ontario’s Child, Youth and Family Services Act, 2017 (CBA, 2020).
-
Category and theme:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation:
Recommendation 17:
The CRC was created by Article 43 of the CRC to implement it, by way of General Comments, and provide international standards that apply to the work that B.C. judges, lawyers and other professionals do in family law. They identify children’s rights and the importance of legal guarantees and apply procedural safeguards in describing how to implement children’s rights in judicial proceedings, which includes but is not limited to obtaining children’s views and requiring all appropriate legal representation (see CRC General Comment 14, para 93). These guarantees and safeguards are not implemented in B.C. nor across Canada and should be implemented (Brown, findlay, Martinson, & Williams, 2021; CBA 2020; Jackson & Martinson, 2019; Martinson & Tempesta, 2018; Martinson & Raven, 2020a).
-
Category and theme:
Groups affected:
Location of recommendation: